Is the book perishing? Some end-of-the-year thoughts
There are many differences between reading a book (or even a magazine) and reading online. To me, a person who considers books some of her closest friends, these differences are not to be ignored in this electronic age. From a new article in Science Daily:
Mangen maintains that reading on a screen generates a new form of mental orientation. The reader loses both the completeness and constituent parts of the physical appearance of the reading material. The physical substance of a book offers tranquility. The text does not move on the page like it does on a screen.
Juxtaposing that article with another caused me to hold my books with new and visceral appreciation. (And I do literally mean "hold" as in grasp or even hug.) The second new article (Washington Post) held somber predictions for the publishing industry.
...
And it seems to me that it is we who are paying no attention, that we hurry home past that empty bookstore, looking blankly in the window, thinking instead about our dinner plans and our weekends, while the last lion of publishing is memorialized and then forgotten and the old houses of legend are abruptly, savagely shuttered.
Some related thoughts were posted by Jordan Furlong (Law21) about the possible future of the legal publishing sector.
For book lovers, not exactly sunny. I don't think the book industry will completely perish but then I may have to eat my words. And my meal might be electronic rather than paper. What are your thoughts on the book's future?
Note (added December 24, 2008, 8:46 AM Mountain): A related article: "Online v. print reading: which one makes us smarter?" (Scientific American). And (added 9:00 AM) "Turning Page, E-Books Start to Take Hold" (New York Times).
Image credit: NinoAndonis.








Comments